Abortion

Respect for Unborn Human Life: The Church’s Constant Teaching

The investors are accusing online stock trading platforms such as Robinhood of manipulating the market in favor of t

Fact sheet by the USCCB Committee on Pro-Life Activities 

The Catechism of the Catholic Church states: “Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law” (No. 2271). 

In response to those who say this teaching has changed or is of recent origin, here are the facts:

  • From earliest times, Christians sharply distinguished themselves from surrounding pagan cultures by rejecting abortion and infanticide.  The earliest widely used documents of Christian teaching and practice after the New Testament in the 1st and 2nd centuries, the Didache (Teaching of the Twelve Apostles) and Letter of Barnabas, condemned both practices, as did early regional and particular Church councils.  
  • To be sure, knowledge of human embryology was very limited until recent times.  Many Christian thinkers accepted the biological theories of their time, based on the writings of Aristotle (4th century BC) and other philosophers.  Aristotle assumed a process was needed over time to turn the matter from a woman’s womb into a being that could receive a specifically human form or soul.  The active formative power for this process was thought to come entirely from the man ‚Äď the existence of the human ovum (egg), like so much of basic biology, was unknown.  
  • However, such mistaken biological theories never changed the Church’s common conviction that abortion is gravely wrong at every stage.  At the very least, early abortion was seen as attacking a being with a human destiny, being prepared by God to receive an immortal soul (cf. Jeremiah 1:5: “Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you”).
  • In the 5th century AD this rejection of abortion at every stage was affirmed by the great bishop-theologian St. Augustine.  He knew of theories about the human soul not being present until some weeks into pregnancy.  Because he used the Greek Septuagint translation of the Old Testament, he also thought the ancient Israelites had imposed a more severe penalty for accidentally causing a miscarriage if the fetus was “fully formed” (Exodus 21: 22-23), language not found in any known Hebrew version of this passage.  But he also held that human knowledge of biology was very limited, and he wisely warned against misusing such theories to risk committing homicide.  He added that God has the power to make up all human deficiencies or lack of development in the Resurrection, so we cannot assume that the earliest aborted children will be excluded from enjoying eternal life with God. 
  • In the 13th century, St. Thomas Aquinas made extensive use of Aristotle’s thought, including his theory that the rational human soul is not present in the first few weeks of pregnancy.  But he also rejected abortion as gravely wrong at every stage, observing that it is a sin “against nature” to reject God’s gift of a new life.
  • During these centuries, theories derived from Aristotle and others influenced the grading of penalties for abortion in Church law.  Some canonical penalties were more severe for a direct abortion after the stage when the human soul was thought to be present.  However, abortion at all stages continued to be seen as a grave moral evil.  
  • From the 13th to 19th centuries, some theologians speculated about rare and difficult cases where they thought an abortion before “formation” or “ensoulment” might be morally justified.  But these theories were discussed and then always rejected, as the Church refined and reaffirmed its understanding of abortion as an intrinsically evil act that can never be morally right.
  • In 1827, with the discovery of the human ovum, the mistaken biology of Aristotle was discredited. Scientists increasingly understood that the union of sperm and egg at conception produces a new living being that is distinct from both mother and father.  Modern genetics demonstrated that this individual is, at the outset, distinctively human, with the inherent and active potential to mature into a human fetus, infant, child and adult.  From 1869 onward the obsolete distinction between the “ensouled” and “unensouled” fetus was permanently removed from canon law on abortion.
  • Secular laws against abortion were being reformed at the same time and in the same way, based on secular medical experts’ realization that “no other doctrine appears to be consonant with reason or physiology but that which admits the embryo to possess vitality from the very moment of conception” (American Medical Association, Report on Criminal Abortion, 1871).
  • Thus modern science has not changed the Church’s constant teaching against abortion, but has underscored how important and reasonable it is, by confirming that the life of each individual of the human species begins with the earliest embryo.
  • Given the scientific fact that a human life begins at conception, the only moral norm needed to understand the Church’s opposition to abortion is the principle that each and every human life has inherent dignity, and thus must be treated with the respect due to a human person.  This is the foundation for the Church’s social doctrine, including its teachings on war, the use of capital punishment, euthanasia, health care, poverty and immigration.  Conversely, to claim that some live human beings do not deserve respect or should not be treated as “persons” (based on changeable factors such as age, condition, location, or lack of mental or physical abilities) is to deny the very idea of inherent human rights.  Such a claim undermines respect for the lives of many vulnerable people before and after birth.

For more information:  Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Declaration on Procured Abortion (1974), nos. 6-7; John R. Connery, S.J., Abortion: The Development of the Roman Catholic Perspective (1977); Germain Grisez, Abortion: The Myths, the Realities, and the Arguments (1970), Chapter IV; U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, On Embryonic Stem Cell Research (2008); Pope John Paul II, Evangelium Vitae (1995), nos. 61-2.

Related Articles

Responses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. I’d like to find out more? I’d want to find out
    some additional information.

    Also visit my webpage :: Vigor Max (Hilda)

  2. My partner and i still cannot quite think that I could possibly be one
    of those reading through the important points found on your site.
    My family and I are sincerely thankful on your generosity and for giving me the potential to pursue the chosen profession path.
    Appreciate your sharing the important information I obtained from your website.

    Here is my web page Arctos Portable AC Reviews

  3. Greetings from Ohio! I’m bored to tears at
    work so I decided to browse your blog on my iphone during lunch break.
    I love the information you present here and can’t wait
    to take a look when I get home. I’m shocked at how fast
    your blog loaded on my cell phone .. I’m not even using WIFI, just
    3G .. Anyhow, superb site!

    My web page – Ketorol Reviews (http://www.wangdaitz.com/)

  4. I do not even know how I ended up here, but I
    thought this post was great. I do not know who you are but certainly you’re going to a famous blogger
    if you are not already ūüėČ Cheers!

    Take a look at my webpage; biodermeux

  5. Hello there! This post could not be written any better!
    Looking through this article reminds me of my previous roommate!
    He continually kept preaching about this. I will forward this
    post to him. Pretty sure he will have a great read.

    Many thanks for sharing!

    Feel free to surf to my blog – 3DS Keto

  6. hello there and thank you for your info ? I?ve certainly picked up something new from right here.

    I did however expertise several technical issues
    using this website, as I experienced to reload the web site many times previous to I could get
    it to load properly. I had been wondering if your web
    host is OK? Not that I’m complaining, but slow loading instances times will very frequently affect your placement in google and could damage your high-quality
    score if ads and marketing with Adwords. Well I?m adding this RSS to my email and
    could look out for a lot more of your respective fascinating content.

    Make sure you update this again very soon..

    my web-site – Aizen Power Male Enhancement – shihan.com.ru

  7. Thank you for your blog post. Thomas and I are
    actually saving for just a new ebook on this matter and your
    article has made us to save our money. Your thoughts
    really solved all our issues. In fact, above what we had acknowledged prior to
    when we stumbled on your excellent blog. I actually no longer
    nurture doubts and also a troubled mind because
    you have clearly attended to our own needs in this post.

    Thanks

    My blog post; Vibrance Labs Ketoroll

  8. I loved as much as you will receive performed proper here.
    The comic strip is tasteful, your authored subject
    matter stylish. nonetheless, you command get bought an edginess over
    that you want be delivering the following. in poor health surely come more before once more since exactly the similar nearly a lot steadily inside case you shield this increase.

    Take a look at my site – forum.adm-tolka.ru

  9. I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great.
    I don’t know who you are but definitely you are going to a
    famous blogger if you are not already ūüėČ Cheers!

    Here is my homepage: Sion Air Cooler

Saint Maria Faustina

Sister Faustina was a young, uneducated nun in a convent of the Congregation of Sisters of Our Lady of Mercy in Poland during the¬†1930s. ¬†She came from a poor family that struggled during the years of World War¬†I. ¬†She had only three years of simple education, so hers were the humblest tasks in the convent, usually in the kitchen or garden. ¬†However, she received extraordinary revelations ‚ÄĒ or messages ‚ÄĒ from our Lord Jesus. ¬†

Though the Divine Mercy message is not new to the teachings of the Church, Sr.¬†Faustina’s¬†Diary¬†sparked a great movement, and a strong and significant focus on the mercy of Christ. ¬†Saint John Paul¬†II canonized Sr.¬†Faustina in¬†2000 making her the “first saint of the new millennium.” ¬†Speaking of Sr.¬†Faustina and the importance of the message contained in her¬†Diary, the Pope called her “the great apostle of Divine Mercy in our time.”

Today, we continue to rely of St.¬†Faustina as a constant reminder of the message to trust in Jesus’ endless mercy, and to live life mercifully toward others. ¬†We also turn to her in prayer and request her intercession to our merciful Savior on our behalf. ¬†At the National Shrine of The Divine Mercy in Stockbridge, Massachusetts, we include the following in our 3¬†o’clock prayers:

Saint Faustina,
you told us that your mission would continue after your death and that you would not forget us. ¬†Our Lord also granted you a great privilege, telling you to “distribute graces as you will, to who you will, and when you will.” ¬†Relying on this, we ask your intercession for the graces we need, especially for the intentions just mentioned. ¬†Help us, above all, to trust in Jesus as you did and thus to glorify His mercy every moment of our lives. ¬†Amen